I’ve posted a short bridge paper on Zenodo that documents a recurring empirical pattern I’ve been circling for some time.

The paper does not introduce a new model, equations, or parameter fitting. Its purpose is narrower: to make explicit that the same scaling structure appears unchanged across nine independent astrophysical observational regimes, even when the usual explanatory handles (motion, local curvature, environment averaging, etc.) are removed.

The paper is intended to stand on its own and to be easy to circulate without additional context. It points directly to the archived observational test suite and treats the data as the primary object. The interpretive framing is deliberately light and non-committal.

Zenodo record (bridge paper):
https://zenodo.org/records/18368450

Supporting observational dataset:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18138870

I’m leaving this to sit for now. The aim here is not visibility, but clarity — to see whether the empirical consistency is something others find worth inspecting, questioning, or extending on its own terms.